Forums : MFLS Central Forum Thread : Gold Cup
[thread started by Stormin Union on Tue 7/7 22:12 ET]
[moderated by 1860 Oakland, SDFC Macross] Pages : First, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Last |
from Seattle SC
on Mon 7/27 19:02 ET
Reply to This Message |
I'm mostly disappointed that in comparable Gold Cups (not the ones squeezed in between WCQ) that in 2011 it was considered a fireable offense to lose in the final and four years later we don't even finish 3rd and it's viewed completely differently with many thinking it's OK and things are just fine.
That's regression. Of our team, of our mindset, and of our expectations. |
from Stormin Union
on Mon 7/27 19:11 ET
Reply to This Message |
Agreed |
from Cánicas AC
on Sun 8/2 12:52 ET
Reply to This Message |
Jeez, Matt, I just said he was using the tournament to test things,
not that he was the first one or a genius for doing so. In my humble
opinion he did it in the right way. |
from Seattle SC
on Sun 8/2 13:27 ET
Reply to This Message |
ha, not supposed to read as if I was flying off the handles. Was trying to drive home the point that there's two different versions of the Gold Cup, one that matters less and can be the one where you 'test' things and one that matters and anything less than winning it is a giant disappointment (which would be this years) ... |
Pages : First, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Last |
|
